Not just children Essay

The stress is effective in that it provides some convincing examples of potential mesh dangers that can be experienced, with emphasis on how these bad guys can stomach away with their deeds with no law to control their actions. I mustiness agree that people who use the lucre should not be lighten from many of the rules and regulations that govern their conduct elsewhere. Its arguments about general online business holds overmuch merit. I do agree that there should be laws against copyright violation, fraud, baby bird filth, trust violation, and child-stalking.However, the essays great failing is that it does not squall the issue of freedom of expression as much as I think it needed to in the context of the topic, especially concerning pornography. Internet pornography is certainly a complicated topic, considering that many children have internet access. The essay contends that pornography must be controlled, particularly because of these children. Although the welfare of c hildren should indeed be of concern to us, I subscribe to the idea that if you dont insufficiency to see, dont look. Encountering big sites (or going anywhere on the internet for that matter) generally requires an active decision by a person. I slay the view that sites on the internet are public only in the sense that they are accessible when a person chooses to access them merely that these sites are not publicly displayed in the sense that a billboard on the street is. Since seeing essence generally involves the decision of a person to visit, making whatever information accessible to whomever chooses to access it seems to be reasonable.There have been times when a search using a seemingly innocuous phrase turns up results with nudity or pornographic content, especially when Im using a search railway locomotive with filters turned off. It seems to me that encountering sites with offensive or objectionable content is unavoidable, even if 1 does not want to come across them. I feel that childrens access to pornographic sites should be restricted. I recognize that total security review would be very difficult to impose, but still, measures should be enacted to deter or hinder young children from accessing such sites.One solution that has been proposed to solve this line advocates a change in the domain naming system that volition easily identify sites that are for adults only (i. e. , pornographic sites). For example, if sites with adult content ends in . xxx rather than the usual domain identifiers, users leave hold up that the site contains adult content, and therefore, can steer clear from it. Using this system, it ordain also be easier to filter out those kinds of websites. However, if there is any censorship, it will affect everyone, not just children.I still subscribe to the idea that it should be the parents/elders responsibility to foster children from the darker side of the internet. History has shown that anything that is suppressed by th e government does not very disappear, but goes underground. Censorship in any form is a eruption to the whole notion of the freedom of expression of the public. With this freedom comes responsibility, and it might actually be better to allow the public to take care of themselves (on the internet) in this regard.